I think you're supposed to read what we write. Please follow/subscribe.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Untitled


He strode along the shore. The evening was dull. Wet mists hung over the ocean, rolled onto land with the tide. The light was cold. The sand was damp and colourless.. He wore a clean coat made of leather. Green rakes of seaweed marked the tide-line. His eyes were partly closed and he began to think.

It had always been destined to fail. She had bored him from the very beginning. When she was in need of emotional satisfaction he had met her with apathy. She was pretty but her character inundated him. She held a certain allure that had sustained the morbid suspension of their relationship. She was older than him. She was a novelty. Their situation had been peculiar. Her kisses were stale, banal.

He lifted his eyes to the steely sand before him. There was no-one to be seen. His black curls irritated his eyes in the damp but he didn’t make an effort to brush them away. His skin was pale and moist. He could hear the soft-tread of his boots on the sand. To the right he heard a cormorant screech. He glimpsed a whitish body hurl itself to the marram fringes and then saw nothing. He imagined the bird's unseen prey. The air was fragrant with dillisk and mineral salts. Once more tilting his head to the water, he swallowed the drizzle which ran down his face in beady tracks. Chinning his collar, he breathed calmly. The water lapped soundlessly to his left.

‘It’s no use. We’ve known for months that it wasn’t ever going to work’. Her supple figure leaned on the window frame. She was wearing a thin moss-green dress. ‘I don’t think we need to argue anymore’. Her voice was sharp. They were in the parlour of his apartment. She had wanted a conversation. ‘Good’, he whispered.. . Eyes unmoving, he inhaled. All was silent and he heard her whimper pathetically and leave through the front door. He had probably disappointed her again. He felt suddenly drowsy in the warmth of his navy jacket and made towards the panelled door. He didn’t suppose that she was going to be back.

He reverted to his surroundings. He noticed the hardness of his exposed skin. He had always been told that sand was an excellent exfoliant. He paused and dug a small handful of sand from a spot of beach before him. He waited for the water to dribble between his fingers and then squeezed the grains into small clumps. He pressed the sand against his cracked lips to curb their hardness. He rubbed until he tasted blood. He rubbed whatever sand was left between his hands until it formed small dry cakes which fell to the ground. He staggered on.

He spied a large boulder although the light was dim. Black of stone against the off-black twilight. He slowed before he reached the rock. It seemed out of place. He sat. The stone was soft and warmer than the air passing across it. He produced a small knife from his breast pocket. He drew a flint from an invisible fold in his trousers and struck it with the blade of the knife. Orange sparks flew and were gone. The light amused him for a moment. The shadow of a smile touched his lips. The water was nearing. He twirled the blade between his fingers and felt across the rock. His thumb fell on a patch of lichen. He touched it sumptuously for a moment. Using his knife, he scratched at the unseen growth until all that was left of it was a fine biological dust. He felt across the newly-exposed patch of stone and sighed.

His mind wandered.He thought of his youth. His father had always told him that violence showed a man’s weakness. His friends were scolded and beaten for being bold. When he misbehaved he was sent to sit on the porch. There, he spent long minutes rubbing the wood of the veranda until it was hot and sweet-smelling. He loved that. When his mother found him shaving the planks with a razor one day she became scared. They thought him strange and beat him. He didn’t really mind. The leather strap stung. It was an endearing sensation.

He let the knife fall to his feet. He was weary.

He didn’t remember where they’d met. It seemed to him that they had always known each-other. The rock was sharp in places. His first memory of them together came to him. He was at the library. She crossed the brown carpet inches from his feet. He followed her across the musty space. She turned down a distant row and vanished. All that was left was her scent. Always like daisies.

They courted and were young, digesting the city. He cared for little other than himself. She often told him that she loved him. He didn’t, couldn’t reciprocate. She drifted away. She grew to hate. That was what had happened. The water was now circling about his feet. The wind carried drifts of hazy fog. Eyes open to the pitchblack, he savoured the breeze.

He suddenly stood. The ends of his trousers were soaked. His eyes saw nothing.. He felt no sentimentality. All he felt was the turbulent breeze against his skin. On a sudden, the wind lifted. The blackness smouldered in the night. The water tugged at his shins with its rhythmic swash and backwash. The wind sped past him now with a whistle. The sound of winds and rolling water collected itself into one single cacophonic tone. The sound then changed as if overtones were being stripped from it. The tumult refined itself until there, barely, existed a pure frequency which came in intoxicating cycles. The man stood invigorated. It was beautiful.

'You didn't love me' she said. He nodded shyly. 'Did you ever love me?'

Then in an instant these memories poured their emotion onto him. He tensed. He felt the lash of brackish wind on his cheek. His family. His introversion. That delirium of the past came upon him. The deluge swirled.

'Aubergine. Aubergine for supper!'. He ran towards the whitewood house. He paused a moment at the wire door to turn and look at the garden. He was hungry. He was six or seven. Snatches of memory. Aubergines were vile.

The storm. He waited, paralysed now. What he could hear became quieter, purer and brighter still. Slowly, precisely, he began to wade. He gasped.

His lungs drank up their liquid fill. His thoughts mingled with the spray.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Saint Hallmark's Day

Valentine's Day is here once more!

It's now half past one on the morning of Sunday the 14th of February and I'm in no way fit to sleep yet. I've therefore decided to be seasonal and to publish a blog post in commemoration of society's most commercial yet loveable holiday, Saint Valentine's Day. Before all of this, though, let's take a quick look at the profile of the man responsible for the feast day, Saint Valentine himself.


Saint Valentine is one of those ancient Christian saints of whom the church knows next to nothing. Other examples of this type of saint are Saint Cian, who was a Welsh hermit, and Saint Peris, who was apparently Saint Cian's master. Damn. My namesake was a manservant. Anyways, in reality, the very existence of saints like Saint Valentine is disputed and I like to think that, even if these people really did exist, their worthiness of sainthood and divinity have been grossly exaggerated by the passing of the years. With the complete lack of any reasonable historical evidence to prove that these people even existed we have to take what we hear about these early saints with a pinch of salt and remember that back in the third century the process of becoming a saint involved nothing more than someone of power in the Church declaring you a saint. There was no inquiry into the religious worthiness of these people. It's probable that most of them purchased their reputation and that their celebrity was based on misinformation.

Pope Gelasius I, who declared Valentine a saint in the first place, described him as being among those martyrs "..whose names are justly reverenced among men, but whose acts are known only to God." This was said 200 years after the death and apparent martyrdom of Valentine. Oh, and the Church thinks that Valentine could have been one of three people:

  • A priest in Rome.
  • A bishop of Interamna, an ancestor of the modern Italian town of Terni.
  • A martyr in the Roman province of Africa.


In short, don't take Saint Valentine's legacy seriously.
It's complete codswallop.


As we've seen, the historical credibility of Saint Valentine is laughable by modern standards, but when has the reason for a holiday ever mattered? Valentine's Day has evolved into a wonderfully materialistic day on which courting couples declare their love for each other by spending, spending and spending some more. The only real profit is found in the money earned by the likes of the major card companies and, to a lesser extent, florists and restaurants. It's played up to be important and undue pressure is put on people, especially men, to splurge out and impress their partners. Sure, show her that you care, but do you really need to spend €20 on that bouquet of flowers to do so?

Me, I won't need to worry about the material aspects of Valentine's Day this year because my valentine is in the US of A at the moment. When I do see her again, I will acknowledge Valentine's Day with a small token of affection, but it will be of my own creation and won't contribute to the huge profit made by corporations involved in the holiday each year.




Less than revolting.

I went to the cinema a week ago for the first time since I saw Avatar.

Coming to think about it, I think it'd be appropriate to begin to refer to events in cinematic history with respect to when Avatar was released. That would make today 2 months and 2o-something days A.A (After Avatar).

I went to see Michael Cera's new flick "Youth in Revolt" with a group of friends I'd been moping around with for the day. I'd been looking forward to seeing the film that whole Saturday afternoon because I'd read an engaging article about it during the Summer and I hadn't been to the cinema in a fair few weeks.
I sat down in the screening room after the film had started. I had been hanging about in the lobby with some friends who were waiting for their popcorn whereas most of the group had already taken their seats. Luckily, by the time I had found my seat in the darkness of the theatre the film was still rolling its opening sequence. The film had been advertised as a comedy, so I wasn't expecting any sort of integrity or meaning. I was optimistic nonetheless and watched the film with an open mind.
I don't know if it was because of my mood while watching the film, but "Youth in Revolt" greatly impressed me.

The film is partly based on a novel of the same name by C.D Payne and follows Nick Twisp (Michael Cera), a rakish and withdrawn teenager. Nick is sixteen and is interested in all sorts of obscure art forms, with a particular love of cinematography. His parents are divorced. He doesn't live with his father and his mother has been involved in a series of short-lived relationships since the separation. He leads his unremarkable life in small-town America as a dorky teenager stereotypically does; he's picked on by his peers and obsesses wildly over girls far out of his league. Thankfully, his life changes when he, his mother's boyfriend and his mother decide to spend some time in a relative's derelict caravan in a rural campsite. The campsite is somewhere in the American outback and is home to Sheeni (Portia Doubleday), an intellectual and beautiful teenager with whom Nick unavoidably falls in love. Disregarding the well presented sub-plots, the rest of the film documents Nick's fall from grace as he overcomes all sorts of obstacles with the aim of being with his newfound love.

Youth in Revolt seems at first to be just one more film of a new breed of which takes into account teenage popular culture and the psychological rollercoaster associated with teenagedom itself (Juno etc.). It may initially remind you of films in the past which have tried and failed to capture the teenage spirit. I can assure you, though, that this film is nowhere near as fruitless as the films we've seen dealing with teenage life in times gone by. It's original and, what's more, it succeeds where other's have failed. Having said thas, however, there were some aspects of the film which could've been improved; the novelty of Michael Cera's generic unfortunate-yet-charming teenage role had worn thin with me and the ending became somewhat sentimental.

With moments of gorgeous cynicism and convincing performances from the dup of young starring actors, "Youth in Revolt" left me confident that modern cinema has retrained the ability to leave its audience refreshed, if somewhat apathetic.


8/10.



Sunday, February 7, 2010

Don't hurt me.

You haven't read a post from me in roughly one month.
I'm back.



Before you bombard me with malicious remarks such as "About time!" or, of a more irrelevant nature, "Your writing style isn't cohesive!", let me justify my absence. Although the cessation was admittedly unnecessary, I'm going to try to explain to you that it wasn't out of complete laziness. Humour me.

It may come as a surprise to you, but I'm a relatively busy person. Those of you who know me personally and are familiar with the chaotic rigmarole that is my life will recognise this. I'm in fifth year, which is considerably more demanding than previous school years. With the senior cycle comes a weightier workload. This workload directly equates to evenings spent pouring over schoolbooks and a loss of free time. I also have a host of extra-curricular activities to contend with. Being continually occupied by something or other, I find it difficult to act on my initiative and to write, edit and publish a blog post. "Why don't you write during your free time?", I hear you ask. The answer is simple, infuriating and most of you will relate to it: when I'm busy, I fervently wish for free time, but when I'm granted it, I tend to while it away achieving nothing. It's a vicious circle. Along with all of this, I don't like to publish blog posts for the sake of it. I want each one to have a premeditated, worthwhile purpose. I want each one to contribute positively to the blog as a whole. As a result, I avoid writing and publishing a post if its topic doesn't completely satisfy me and I publish fewer posts than most. All of this, coupled with my atrocious tendency to procrastinate, led to my month long hiccup.

Now I'm back, however.

Don't expect any further hiatuses. I'm brimming with eclectic post ideas. I don't care if my future posts slip into the farthest reaches of the blogosphere unnoticed; I want them to be published regardless of the response they incite. They will be original, kooky creations. Once I firmly establish a rota with Seabird, you will be able to rely on a stream of continuous original content. When I gain momentum, there's no stopping me.


The future is bright.
The future is hostile and albatross.




Saturday, January 9, 2010

To Tweet or not to Tweet.

Should I join Twitter?



Before you all raise your proverbial internet voices to supply your answer to the question, let me firstly explain what Twitter is, for those of you who've spent the last decade of your lives inhabiting an abandoned coal reserve in the Carpathian mountains. Explaining to you what Twitter is might also cause me to suddenly realise what I should do, too...or perhaps not. Anyway, having explained what it's all about, I'll give you my opinion on it. Hooray.

As far as Wikipedia knows, "Twitter" is a "free social networking and microblogging service that enables its users to send and read messages known as tweets." Basically, I join and let others follow my account. My hypothetical followers can view my tweets, or short snippets of text, and thereby can know my every opinion, action and location at any given moment. Every user has a profile, like most social networking sites, but the focus is put on the continuous creation of and response to tweets. As you can imagine, the tweets add up. Some people tweet ridiculously frequently, too. In reality, it could be conceived as the ultimate social networking utility, because those following your account can reply to your tweets, or direct their tweets at you, allowing for real-time communication. Apparently, if my brother is to be believed, the tweet is gradually coming to replace the text message in the United States.

"Sounds fantastic!", you say; "Why haven't you already joined?". This is where my conservative nature comes into the spotlight. I have two main reasons for my hesitation. Firstly, I can imagine myself being a devoted Twitter fan. I can imagine myself using it to its full potential, and using it to share any thought that comes to my mind. This is partially where the problem lies. I could and would become a what is known as a Twitter whore:


18:32 Chicken just sneezed.

18:34 Chicken sneezed again.

18:38 Chicken hasn't sneezed in 4 minutes. Getting worried.


It's that type of obsessive-compulsive behaviour I can imagine myself becoming involved in. The prospect is frightening. With that in mind, there is another reason for my hesitation in joining Twitter. Joining Twitter would mean that I'd have finally come to allow the internet into my daily life. It would mean that the internet would become part of my everyday routine; a necessary part. Sure, the internet is a part of my daily life already, with Facebook a daily feature and surfing sessions at night the norm, but Twitter is different. Some people constantly update their Twitter accounts. People use Twitter on their mobiles while eating breakfast, while going to work, while at the cinema and while almost anywhere. Twitter, for those people, goes hand in hand with every daily activity. I don't know if I'm ready to allow the internet to become a continuous and essential part of my life like that.

Twitter epitomises modern Western society; a society in which, let's face it, the internet is a source and a sink of content, knowledge and communication. It's a society in which traditional values and direct human contact are becoming less and less prevalent and important.

I don't particularly want to accept that.

The Tale Of Yesterday.

Oh, Fridays...

Friday started fairly abnormally. I had had Thursday off school due too "dangerous conditions". Apparently my roar of disgruntlement when I was woken sounded like a Triceratops giving birth. I don't entirely disagree with that statement.

I reluctantly trod to school. Got the DART from Seapoint to Booterstown, and walked from there to the school. I must say, Ireland is pretty damn scenic under a sprinkling of snow. The sand on the beach was covered in a light dusting of the stuff, and everything was white. I got caught up in the scene and was nearly late for school. As I passed through the woods out the back of the school, I felt a sudden urge to tinkle. There was not a soul about. As I was about to em.. unzip, I heard a loud rustling in nearby bushes.
Nearly had a stroke. Turned out to be a rodent of some sort though.

I turned up to school at last. I'm pretty sure there was a grand total of 12 people there. School sucked. An Australian forensic scientist came over and gave us a "case" to solve. From the start she told us that it was not in any way similar of CSI. I immediately lost all interest. I'm pretty sure someone interested in science would have liked it though, I mean, there were DNA charts and Blood Types and all that jazz.

After school the small group disassembled and went off to separate homes. I was the only person there from around Seapoint, so I walked home all ALONE. I didn't mind in the end though. Dublin had a large coat of whitewash over all of it's immediately visible problems. The fountain in one of the sub-lanes of Booterstown avenue was frozen, a pretty cool sight to behold. I got to the dart station 5 CENTS short of my DART fare. Guess I was walking home. I MEAN 5 CENTS! COME ON!

Walked though Blackrock Park. The lake was frozen over. Guess who decided to check out how strong it was.

That's right.

I fell into the lake. And it was pretty damn freezing. To be fair though, only half of my left leg fell in, it wasn't that bad, although it could well have been a lot worse. Afterwards I traced this site's name in the snow. I'm pretty sure it wasn't the best attempt at advertising.

I got home. Got the goggle eyes from the parents. Strangely enough, I got looks of admiration from my brother. This has never occurred before. Today he said that he wishes to be just like me when he gets older.

Good luck to him.

Yours from a block of ice,

- Seabird.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Wandering Rant No.1

All my life I have been exposed to humour. Which has been pretty cool generally, but in the last year some types have humour have started to really tickle my angry inner cynic.
Do you remember when sarcasm used to be the lowest form of humour? My dad repeatedly states that to this day, each time I make use of that tool. I'm not sure it is anymore. Recently New types have humour have emerged, even more banal and repetitive than sarcasm.
Here's a neat little list:

- INNUENDO (do I really have to go through people saying that's what she said for EVERYTHING I say?)

- ALGEBRA RELATED QUIPS

- NICKELODEON

- CHUCK NORRIS JOKES

- OBSESSIVE OFFENSE (coughcough tommy tiernan)

- FUNNY GLASSES

- FACEBOOK GROUPS

- CHRISTMAS CRACKERS

- YOUR UNCLE

- LISTS

- TWITTER

- ADAM SANDLER

The funny thing about all these forms is they reek of desperate (and lazy) attempts to be funny. I'm not saying good hasn't come out of any of these forms (with the exceptions of adam sandler and christmas crackers) but it's just so excessive now that I can't bear it.

Actually, on the other hand all of these do make sarcasm acceptable again. Maybe its for the greater good...

Yours Grumpily,

- Seabird